Legal Opinion

Resnick v. Meybohm Realty, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 21, 2004No. A04A1048PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Presiding Judge.

Following an explosion at her recently purchased home, Frances Resnick sued her real estate agent, Meybohm Realty, Inc. (“Mey-bohm”), and the seller’s agent, Blanchard & Calhoun Real Estate Company (“B&C”), for damages resulting from the explosion. Resnick also alleged that Meybohm breached its duties to her by “suppressing” information about the house and providing false price information. Both defendants filed motions for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. Resnick appeals, and for reasons that follow, we affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fann v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Browning v. StocksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Pennington v. BraxleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Harrell v. Federal National Payables, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alexander v. A. Atlanta Autosave, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Harrouk v. FiermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Peacock v. KiserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Prince v. EspositoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Pollman v. SwanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API