Legal Opinion

Alexander v. A. Atlanta Autosave, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 9, 2005No. A04A2046PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Tessa Alexander appeals the grant of summary judgment to A. Atlanta Autosave, Inc. (“Autosave”), on her counterclaim for fraud arising out of a rental car transaction and the denial of her motion for sanctions. Based on the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

To obtain summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, this Court applies a de novo standard of review and must draw all inferences…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Munroe v. Universal Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. John Crane, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  3. Nairon v. LandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Johnson v. RodierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Ingram v. JIK Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. DaimlerChrysler Motors Co., LLC v. ClementeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Leo v. Waffle House, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Adams v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Artson, LLC v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Abdul-Malik v. AirTran Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API