Legal Opinion
Feinblum v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 5, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The individual defendants were owners of premises on Forty-first street, Queens. Two greenhouses had been constructed thereon, and water from the eaves of both fell into a narrow alleyway between them. The overflow of the water ran across the sidewalk, causing ice to form thereon in winter. Plaintiff Mary Feinblum, on January 14, 1935, while walking on the sidewalk, slipped and fell on this ice, sustaining serious injuries. There was no snow or ice on the sidewalks in this vicinity. This *331action was brought by Mary Feinblum to recover damages for the injuries she suffered, and by her husband…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Todd v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Klepper v. Seymour House Corp. of Ogdensburg, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Taylor v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Taylor v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Kopper v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reedy Et Vir v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Maucieri v. WareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Mazanti v. Wright's Underwear Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- McKay v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Minton v. Richmond Bennett Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965