Legal Opinion

Davis v. Cousineau

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 12, 1963No. Eq. Nos. 3101-3103Published

1Opinion of the Court

196 A.2d 153 (1963)

Clinton L. DAVIS,

v.

James E. COUSINEAU.

Howard T. MOFFETT,

v.

William A. ORME.

George M. GLEAVEY,

v.

Frank WHORF.

Eq. Nos. 3101-3103.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island.

December 12, 1963.

Motion for Reargument Denied December 17, 1963.

Joseph Mainelli, Providence, for petitioners.

James R. Morriss, City Sol. Howard R. Haronian, Asst. City Sol., for City of Warwick, for respondents.

Motion for Reargument Denied in No. 3103, December 17, 1963.

JOSLIN, Justice.

These are petitions in equity in the nature of quo warranto, brought in this court under G.L. 1956, § 10-14-1, to determine as between…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aniello v. MarcelloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1960
  2. Davis v. CousineauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1963
  3. Davis v. Cranston Print Works Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1957
  4. Garvin v. McCarthySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1916
  5. Horton v. City Council & City Treasurer of NewportSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API