Legal Opinion

Newman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 19, 1998No. 97-4232PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, Harold Eugene Newman, contends that his prosecution for the offense of *812escape is barred by the statute of limitations. His motion to dismiss having been denied by the trial court, Newman seeks a writ of prohibition. We have jurisdiction. Neal v. State, 697 So.2d 903 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Finding petitioner’s argument to be well-taken, we grant the petition, issue the writ, and direct the trial court to dismiss the pending charge.

Petitioner apparently failed to return to a correctional institution after a day of work release, and was charged with escape. The information was filed on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Neal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Fleming v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Currie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LongSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. McGregor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API