Legal Opinion

Kemerer v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 14, 1941No. 32,911PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

In an action by one Carrie Kemerer against B. T. Kemerer and ■ Martin Mock, there ivas judgment for plaintiff against defendants. Kemerer v. Mock, 198 Minn. 316, 269 N. W. 832. The judgment ivas paid by State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company, one of the defendants here, as insurer of Mock, and thereafter B. T. Kemerer brought suit to enjoin enforcement of the judgment against him so as to compel him to contribute one-half the amount of the judgment. A general demurrer to the complaint ivas sustained. See Kemerer v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 201 Minn. 239, 276 N. W. 228,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kemerer v. State Farm Mutual Auto InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. ChristensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Kemerer v. MockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Motorists Insurance Co. v. VigenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Village of HewittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Judd v. LandinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Bunge v. YagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. DanberrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API