Kemerer v. Mock
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
Defendants separately appeal from the judgment, their separate motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial having been denied.
Shortly after seven o’clock on the evening of December 8, 1934, automobiles owned and driven by defendants collided at the intersection of Fourth avenue and Fourth street south in the city of St. Cloud, in which collision plaintiff, a guest passenger in defendant Kemerer’s Studebaker sedan, claims to have been injured. The defendant Mock’s car was a Plymouth sedan. As far as the testimony discloses, both cars had efficient brakes and…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Village of HewittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Knox v. City of Granite FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Bunge v. YagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Larson v. Le MereSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Kemerer v. State Farm Mutual Auto InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.