Legal Opinion

LXR RS V, LLC v. MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 2019No. 2:19-cv-01397Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LXR RS V, LLC, Case No. 2:19-cv-01397-JDW Plaintiff v. MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN, Defendant MEMORANDUM Pennsylvania law permits municipalities to require property owners to obtain a Use and Occupancy (“U&O”) Certificate before selling real property. See 68 P.S. § 1082.1. The Municipality of Norristown imposes such a requirement. Plaintiff LXR RS V, LLC (“LXR”) claims in this case that Norristown’s requirements, at least as applied to it, imposed a temporary taking, violated its rights to substantive and procedural…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API