Legal Opinion
Cummings v. Connell
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 2, 2001No. CIV.S-99-2176 WBSDADPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHUBB, District Judge.
Named plaintiffs represent a class of state employees organized in bargaining units represented by defendant California State Employees Association, Local 1000 (“CSEA” or “the union”). Plaintiffs, who are not union members, allege that CSEA has been improperly withholding a portion of union dues from their paychecks without providing them with the procedural safeguards mandated by Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, 475 U.S. 292, 106 S.Ct. 1066, 89 L.Ed.2d 232 (1986). In addition, plaintiffs claim that the indemnification provision contained in the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Swanson v. University of Hawaii Professional AssemblyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2003
- Cummings v. ConnellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003