Kryl v. Frank Holton & Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
Fraudulent advertising is prohibited, and no person is permitted, for the purpose of selling merchandise directly or indirectly to the public, to induce the public to purchase by publishing in a newspaper, circular, pamphlet, or poster, an advertisement of anything so offered to the public containing any assertion, representation, or statement of fact which is untrue, deceptive, or misleading.
In sec. 343.413 (1),.Stats., the policy of preventing publication of deceptive advertising is fixed by the legislature. In addition to the statutory prohibition, there is a rule of law which has long…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blakely v. SousaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Messer v. FadettesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Lowe v. CrockerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Jerome v. BigelowIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by6 opinions
- Colbert v. Ashland Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Hiltpold v. T-Shirts Plus, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Blossom Farm Products Co. v. Kasson Cheese Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- Sterling Vision DKM, Inc. v. GordonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997
- Cornwell v. City of Stevens PointCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.