Legal Opinion

Burlington Northern & Sante Fe Railway Co. v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1999No. Civil 980194PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] The Burlington Northern and Sante Fe Railway Company, formerly known as Burlington Northern Railroad Company, (Burlington Northern) appeals from a judgment dismissing its action for breach of a fiduciary duty against Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company, formerly known as Meridian (Meridian). We hold Burlington Northern’s authorization for Meridian to deal “for its own account” with Burlington Northern’s oil and gas rights was an “authority expressed in general terms” under N.D.C.C. § 3-02-05, and thus the obligations of a trustee under N.D.C.C. §§ 59-01-09 to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of MehusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Matter of Estate of LutzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Edwards v. EdwardsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Farmers Union Oil Co. of Dickinson v. WoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Birnbaum v. BirnbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Heckelsmiller v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Alerus Financial, N.A. v. Western State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. DeCoteau v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Grynberg v. Dome Petroleum Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Patten v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API