Legal Opinion

Neilson v. Rhine Shipping Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 7, 1919No. Nos. 393 and 394PublishedCited by 12 opinions

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. The cases are stated in the opinion. A contract cannot be. given legal effect in a court of the United States which is contrary todhe declared public policy, of the United States; and this rule is not .affected by the fact that the objectionable parts of the contracts ■ have been éxecuted and that those remaining are innocuous. Hope v. Hope, 8 DeG.

Read the full summary

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. The cases are stated in the opinion. A contract cannot be. given legal effect in a court of the United States which is contrary todhe declared public policy, of the United States; and this rule is not .affected by the fact that the objectionable parts of the contracts ■ have been éxecuted and that those remaining are innocuous. Hope v. Hope, 8 DeG. M. & G. 731; The Kensing-ton, 183 U. S/263. The policy of a State is evidenced by its constitution • and laws. It is also obvious that no State.will give effect to the laws of…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

These cases were considered together in the courts below and may be disposed of in like manner here.

The facts axe:

In the first case Paul Neilson and nine other seamen sue for the recovery of wages claimed to be due them from the bark “Rhine;” It appears that they shipped on the American bark “Rhine” at Buenos Ayres, October 7, 1916, for a voyage to New York, at the rate of $25 per month. -It is stipulated that the shipping of seamen on sailing vessels, at Buenos Ayres is controlled by certain shipping masters, to one of whom the libelants, in ac*212cordance with the usual custom and as a means of…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Benz v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Strathearn Steamship Co. v. DillonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Lakos v. SaliarisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  4. The Sonderborg.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  5. Jackson v. S. S. "Archimedes"Supreme Court of the United States · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API