Wallace v. Red Bull Distributing Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SARA LIOI, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the motion (Doc No. 10) of defendants Red Bull Distribution Company (“RBDC”)1 and Jeff Barta (“Barta”) to dismiss the action or, alternatively, to stay the proceedings, and to compel arbitration. Plaintiff Jeffrey J. Wallace (“Wallace” or “plaintiff’) has filed an opposition (Doc. No. 11), and defendants have submitted a brief in reply (Doc. No. 12). The matter is ripe for determination. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion to dismiss and compel arbitration is GRANTED.2
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Samenow v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Adelstein v. Walmart Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- Rayford, Jr. v. Discover Financial ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- Townsend v. Stand Up Management, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019