Legal Opinion

Emerson v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1999No. 98-305PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

Appellant James Emerson was charged with aggravated burglary following the theft of several items from property located outside of Casper. At trial, the jury found him guilty of the lesser offense of burglary. Appellant claims he was denied a fair trial because the prosecutor improperly inferred that the jury could find Appellant guilty even without finding guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Appellant further claims error in the trial court’s refusal to admit allegedly crucial evidence and in its denial of a continuance in light of the State’s failure to timely produce evidence.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  2. United States v. BrazelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Jerome Gatto, Virgil Redmond, Joseph Bonanno, Jr., and Salvatore BonannoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Jahnke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Guy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Teniente v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Lane v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Robinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API