Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Solomon

New York Family Court

Decided October 20, 1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSicher, J.

Oh December 12,1946, Justice Diserio entered an order directing respondent to pay into this court the sum of $12 each week towards petitioner’s support, until further order of this court.

Under such formal order he indorsed: “ On means basis thereby indicating that he adjudged the petitioner wife entitled to support “ according to respondent’s means and station in life ” (Harding v. Harding, 203 App. Div. 721, affd. 236 N. Y. 514; cf. Garlock v. Garlock, 279 N. Y. 337, 340) and that respondent was chargeable accordingly rather than merely with the minimal obligation of a husband to indemnify…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Garlock v. GarlockNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Smith v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Harding v. . HardingNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Harding v. HardingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. Karminski v. KarminskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. SullivanNew York City Family Court · 1966
  2. Loeb v. LoebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  3. Harrison v. HarrisonNew York Family Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API