Legal Opinion

Jewell v. City of Indianapolis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 2011No. 49A02-1010-OV-1228PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge.

Elmos Jewell appeals from a judgment of the Marion County Superior Court finding him in violation of § 531-728 of the Revised Code of the Consolidated City and Marion County (the Revised Code). Jewell presents the following consolidated and restated issue for review: Did the City of Indianapolis (the City) waive enforcement of § 531-728 by not explicitly referring to that section in a written agreement resolving the allegations against Jewell?

We affirm.

The facts are that on August 22, 2008, Animal Care and Control Division of the Department of Public Safety (ACCD)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Pannarale v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Dexter Axle Co. v. Baan USA, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Januchowski v. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re: The Matter of the Supervised Administration of the Estate of Wayne Lewis Stayback, Joseph Stayback v. Jeffrey Stayback and Julie WarnkeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Hugo Torres v. City of HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. In Re The Guardianship of Carlton H. Word Timothy W. Word and Tracy L. Wise v. Rance Buehrer, Guardian of Carlton H. WordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. John Aikman v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Yulanda C. Petty v. John T. PettyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API