Legal Opinion
Charles v. Scheibel
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMichael J. Larkin, J.
The defendants contend that no valid agreement was made and entered into; that the alleged agreement was delivered conditionally and was not to become binding until the purchase of the property met the approval of their children; that no part of the consideration of sale was paid; that defendants never entered into possession of the property and exercised no rights of ownership thereof; that the title, possession and control of the property at all times remained in plaintiff; that plaintiff surrendered no rights respecting the property; that no title was tendered to defendants and no offer to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ziehen v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Williams v. . HaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Brownell v. Board of Education of Inside Tax District of City of Saratoga SpringsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Seymour v. . McKinstryNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Freeson v. . BissellNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bean v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re the Estate of De StuersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
- Ceravolo v. BucknerNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Mohawk Carpet Mills, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940
- Buffalo Savings Bank v. Siger, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.