Queen's Grant Villas Horizontal Property Regimes I-V v. Daniel International Corp.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
Appellants, Queen’s Grant Villas Horizontal Property Regimes I-V (the Regimes), brought these actions against respondents for alleged defects in the construction of the common elements of a condominum project. The lower court granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment, finding the Regimes lacked standing to maintain the actions. We reverse.
A property regime has standing to bring an action for construction defects in common elements that the regime has the duty to maintain. Roundtree Villas Ass’n v. 4701 Kings Corp., 282 S. C. 415, 321 S. E. (2d) 46 (1984). In this case,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Roundtree Villas Assoc., Inc. v. KINGS CORP.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Dockside Ass'n v. Detyens, Simmons & CarlisleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jablonsky v. KlemmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Queen's Grant II Horizontal Property Regime v. Greenwood Development Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Charleston Joint Venture v. McPhersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Bardoon Properties, NV v. Eidolon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Murphy v. Yacht Cove Homeowners Assoc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.