Libke v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The single issue involved in this review is whether the same standard applies to the consideration of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea before sentence as after ?
We conclude that trial courts should apply a somewhat different standard in assessing a motion to withdraw a guilty plea before sentence than after. It should be easier to withdraw a plea before sentence than after.1 The trial court erroneously applied the same standard in that he determined that a manifest injustice to the defendant must be established.
The different standard in assessing a motion to withdraw a guilty plea before…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- McCleary v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. ReppinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Wilson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. BolligWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. McCallumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. HandySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. JenkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.