Legal Opinion

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,433 Shawmut Bank, N.A., as Trustee Eaton Vance California Municipals Trust, and Municipal Securities Trust High Income Series 10 Municipal Securities Trust High Income Series 11 v. Kress Associates Paul F. Klapper Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison Jones, Hall, Hill & White Freytag & Laforce Bear, Stearns & Company, Inc., and First Interstate Bank of California, Shawmut Bank, N.A., as Trustee Municipal Securities Trust High Income Series 10 Municipal Securities Trust High Income Series 11, and Eaton Vance California Municipals Trust v. Kress Associates Paul F. Klapper Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison Jones, Hall, Hill & White Freytag & Laforce, and Bear, Stearns & Company, Inc. First Interstate Bank of California, Shawmut Bank, N.A., as Trustee Eaton Vance California Municipals Trust Municipal Securities Trust High Income Series 10 Municipal Securities Trust High Income Series 11 v. Kress Associates Paul F. Klapper, and Thomas C. Dashiell, Esq., and Freytag & Laforce, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee v. First Interstate Bank of California, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison Jones, Hall, Hill & White, Defendants-Cross-Defendants-Appellees v. Bear, Stearns & Company, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party-Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 8, 1994No. 92-55907Published

1Opinion of the Court

33 F.3d 1477

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,433

SHAWMUT BANK, N.A., as Trustee; Eaton Vance California

Municipals Trust, Plaintiffs,

and

Municipal Securities Trust High Income Series 10; Municipal

Securities Trust High Income Series 11,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

KRESS ASSOCIATES; Paul F. Klapper; Brobeck, Phleger &

Harrison; Jones, Hall, Hill & White; Freytag &

LaForce; Bear, Stearns & Company, Inc.,

Defendants,

and

First Interstate Bank of California, Defendant-Appellee.

SHAWMUT BANK, N.A., as Trustee; Municipal Securities Trust

High Income Series 10; Municipal Securities Trust

High Income Series 11, Plaintiffs,

and

Ea…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API