Holmgren v. Isaacson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to determine adverse claims to certain real estate. The case was tried before Ensign, J., who found as conclusion of law that the defendant was entitled to a judgment that he was the owner in fee of the premises in dispute. From an order denying her motion to amend the findings or for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
On February 3, 1906, the plaintiff commenced this action in the district court of the county of St. Louis to determine adverse claims to eighty acres of land. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was the owner in fee of the land, that it was vacant and unoccupied, and that the defendant claimed an estate or interest therein adverse to the plaintiff. The answer admitted that the defendant claimed an estate in the land adverse to the plaintiff, and put in issue the other allegations of the complaint, and alleged that the defendant was the owner of the land in fee, and was and had been in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dean v. GoddardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Backus v. BurkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Costello v. EdsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Wheeler v. GormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- DeMars v. Robinson King Floors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Gaston v. MaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- State of Minnesota Office of the Attorney General v. Madison Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2026