Legal Opinion
Mail-Well Envelope v. International Association Of Machinists And Aerospace Workers
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 10, 1990No. 89-3689PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
916 F.2d 344
135 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2687, 116 Lab.Cas. P 10,361
MAIL-WELL ENVELOPE, CLEVELAND DIVISION, A Company of Great
Northern Nekoosa Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE
WORKERS, DISTRICT 54, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 89-3689.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued June 8, 1990.
Decided Oct. 10, 1990.
Lee J. Hutton (argued), Marc J. Bloch, and Charles A. Linn, Duvin, Cahn & Barnard, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellant.
David Roloff (argued), Gaines & Stern, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant-appellee.
Before JONES and NELSON, Circuit…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Interstate Brands Corporation, Butternut Bread Division v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen and Helpers Local Union No. 135Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Peerless Importers, Inc. v. Wine, Liquor & Distillery Workers Union Local One, John Schumacher, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc, Local 1123 Albert A. Deangelis v. The Timken CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Local Union 1199 v. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- LOCAL 377, CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS, WAREHOUSEMEN, AND HELPERS OF AMERICA v. Humility of Mary Health PartnersDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003