Legal Opinion

Lytal v. Crank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 7, 1966No. 5-3775PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellee brought this action against appellant and Mr. Marvin Coulter for the recovery of property damages resulting from.an automobile collision. Appellee dismissed his complaint against Coulter before the trial. A jury awarded appellee $420.78 and from a judgment accordingly entered comes this appeal.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in overruling his written demurrer to the evidence since the evidence failed to indicate that any act or conduct of appellant was the proximate cause of appellee’s damages. A written demurrer to the evidence is permissible in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Werbe v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Hill v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Granite Mountain Rest Home, Inc. v. SchwarzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Gage v. HarveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
  5. Grooms v. Neff Harness Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Physicians Insurance Co. v. HruskaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Svestka v. FIRST NAT. BANK IN STUTTGARTSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Thomas v. KellettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Widmer v. Fort Smith Vehicle & MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Widmer v. Fort Smith Vehicle & MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API