Legal Opinion

Frick & Lindsey Co. v. Holbrook & Parks

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 14, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Turner, Commissioner

Affirming.

Appellant is a foreign corporation engaged in tbe selling of oil well supplies, and in 1920 maintained three such concerns in this state. Its principal place of business was Winchester, where it had an agent designated as such for service of process.

Appellees, Holbrook and Parks, were partners and engaged in Ohio county, Kentucky, in operating oil wells and developing oil lands. They each lived in that county.

In the fall of 1920, they were engaged in the cleaning out of some old oil wells in that county with a view to further operating and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barnard v. NapierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Glover Machine Works v. Cooke-Jellico Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Kentucky Refining Co. v. Globe Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  4. White Plains Coal Co. v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. B. F. Swartz & Co. v. Woldert Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rh Kyle Furniture Company v. Russell Dry Goods CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  2. Junius H. Stone Corp. v. Princeton Ice & Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API