Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Krushnic v. West
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 7, 1929No. 4823PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.
Appellant, hereafter referred to as plaintiff, filed his petition for a writ of mandamus against the Secretary of the Interior to compel the issuance to him of a patent to certain oil shale mining land in Garfield county, Colorado. On the response to the rule to show cause, the court, on hearing, discharged the rule and dismissed the petition.
From the facts set forth in the petition, and admitted by the response to the rule, it appears that plaintiff and seven associates, on October 1, 1919, located, together with a number of other claims, the mining claim here…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- United States v. SchurzSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Forbes v. GraceySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Payne v. Central Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- West Coast Exploration Co. v. McKay Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Marathon Oil Co. v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Marathon Oil Company v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Ickes v. Virginia-Colorado Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934