Becker Warburg Paribas Group Inc. v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDÚM OPINION
GRADY, District Judge.
This cause comes before the court on cross motions for summary judgment on Count II of the three-count complaint. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Counts I and III have been dismissed pursuant to settlement by the parties. All the facts relevant to Count II have been stipulated to and there is no dispute of fact which would preclude our granting summary judgment. For reasons discussed below, we grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is therefore denied.
FACTS
This is an action for a refund of taxes for the year 1971. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Hort v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kieselbach v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Booth Newspapers, Inc. v. The United States. The Evening News Association v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- W. W. Windle Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.