Legal Opinion

Becker Warburg Paribas Group Inc. v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 26, 1981No. 78 C 2065Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDÚM OPINION

GRADY, District Judge.

This cause comes before the court on cross motions for summary judgment on Count II of the three-count complaint. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Counts I and III have been dismissed pursuant to settlement by the parties. All the facts relevant to Count II have been stipulated to and there is no dispute of fact which would preclude our granting summary judgment. For reasons discussed below, we grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is therefore denied.

FACTS

This is an action for a refund of taxes for the year 1971. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Hort v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Kieselbach v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Booth Newspapers, Inc. v. The United States. The Evening News Association v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  5. W. W. Windle Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API