Legal Opinion
Janusz Omeluk v. Langsten Slip & Batbyggeri A/s
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 14, 1995No. 93-35389PublishedCited by 186 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:
The sole issue before us is whether the defendant’s contacts with the forum adequately supported the exercise of personal jurisdiction. We affirm the district court’s dismissal, because they did not.
I. FACTS
The case was dismissed on what was called a motion for summary judgment based on lack of jurisdiction, but more properly should be considered a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). The district court did not hear testimony or make findings of fact. Instead, each side submitted declarations, deposition testimony and other evidence,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by186 opinions
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Moki Mac River Expeditions v. DruggTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Panavision International, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership v. Dennis Toeppen Network Solutions, Inc., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.