Legal Opinion
Cedric R. Allen v. Robert G. Borg Attorney General of the State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 18, 1992No. 90-55860Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
955 F.2d 47
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Cedric R. ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Robert G. BORG; Attorney General of the State of
California, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 90-55860.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 13, 1992.
Decided Feb. 18, 1992.
Before CANBY, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Raymond Edward Middleton v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Charles Anderson Miller v. Daniel B. Vasquez, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Robert Lee Norris v. Henry Risley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.