Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Oil Well Drilling Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1942No. 4715PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MABRY, Justice.

Suit was brought by plaintiff-appellant against defendant-appellee hereinafter referred to as plaintiff and defendant respectively, for overtime pay under the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. The appeal is taken from the judgment of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the amended complaint. We thus have the complaint, supplemented by a stipulation, from which we get the facts in the case. It is not disputed that the oils produced from the wells in question move in interstate commerce. Defendant contends that we must look to the service…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Mulford v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Bowie v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  4. Fleming v. A. B. Kirschbaum Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  5. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. HargraveCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Slover v. WathenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  2. Atwater v. GaylordWyoming Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API