Legal Opinion

Ware v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1930PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stevens, J.(1) The chief question presented is whether the court erred in admitting the diary of the defendant in evidence. Without this diary the proof is sufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty, although there was such conflict in the evidence as might have led the jury to find the defendant not guilty. But the diary presents such persuasive evidence of guilt as to lead any open-minded trier of fact to render a verdict of guilty. Upon this state of the record the substantial rights of the defendant were prejudiced if the diary ought not to have been received in evidence.

Defendant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Imboden v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  4. Smith v. MerrillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. MajorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. HochmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Potman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State ex rel. Alford v. ThorsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Warner v. GregoryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API