Legal Opinion
J.A. Morrissey, Inc. v. Smejkal
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided July 2, 2010No. 2009-215PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
¶ 1. This case arises from the demise of a business relationship within a construction company. Defendants Peter Smejkal, Iva Smejkal, Merkur Construction, LLC, and IS Enterprises, LLC appeal from the partial denial of their post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law, or in the alternative, for a new trial, following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs Jeanne Morrissey and J.A. Morrissey, Inc. in an action for breach of fiduciary duty, interference with business relations, and fraudulent conveyance. We affirm.
¶2. Peter Smejkal began his employment as an estimator and project manager…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Foodcomm International v. Patrick James BarryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Brueckner v. Norwich UniversitySupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Monahan v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Augat, Inc. v. Aegis, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Gary L. Monette D/B/A Gary's International Bread v. Am-7-7 Baking Company, Ltd. D/B/A International Baking Company and Antonio MalandruccoloCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- In re Estate of Alden v. Alden v. AldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Vincent v. DeVriesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Kneebinding, Inc., John Springer-Miller, Tina Springer-Miller and ACL Investments, LLC v. Richard HowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Skaskiw and Vermont Volunteer Services for Animals Humane SocietySupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.