Legal Opinion

Solem v. Connecticut Fire Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1910No. 2,833PublishedCited by 6 opinions

.. Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; Jeremiah J. Lynch, Judge. Action by S. L. Solem against the Connecticut Fire Insurance' Company of Hartford, Connecticut. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals therefrom and from an order denying it a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

The complaint in this action contains two counts, and, while ■they are labeled “causes of action,” it is manifest that the plaintiff sought to state but a single cause of action in two separate •counts. The first count declares upon the policy of fire insurance ; the second alleges the making of the contract of insurance •on October 14, 1907, by which certain property belonging to the plaintiff was insured for one year for $1,225. It gives a general •description of the property, alleges the destruction of it by fire on February 19,1908, and the loss suffered by plaintiff by reason thereof;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Donovan v. McDevittMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Randall v. American Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Greiss v. State Investment & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. PayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  5. Georgia Home Insurance v. Kline & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shea v. North-Butte Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. State ex rel. Stuewe v. HindsonMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Town of Cascade v. County of CascadeMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Ætna Ins. v. HefferlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
  5. Green v. WolffMontana Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API