Legal Opinion

State v. Fournier

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 1, 1963No. 390PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHulburd, C. J.

The respondent was tried and convicted, under 23 V.S.A. §1183, of operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. During the course of the trial, the prosecuting officer, the grand juror of the City of Winooski, sought to inquire of the respondent on cross-examination whether he had been convicted before of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The complaint did not charge the re spondent with a second offense. Counsel for the respondent objected to the question. The prosecutor stated that the evidence was offered as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GarceauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  2. Groves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Underwood v. CraySupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  4. Flowers v. Benton County Beer BoardTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re BerkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. Matter of OliverIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Pond v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  4. State v. ManningSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  5. State v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API