Legal Opinion
Magyar v. AMER. T. & T. CO.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 19, 1965PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
88 N.J. Super. 18 (1965)
210 A.2d 434
JOSEPH J. MAGYAR, JR. AND RUTH T. MAGYAR, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided May 19, 1965.
Mr. Bruce Schragger for plaintiffs (Messrs. Schragger, Schragger & Lavine, attorneys).
Mr. David G. Eynon for defendants (Messrs. McCord, Farrell & Eynon, attorneys).
BENNETT, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
This is a motion by defendant Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania, which challenges the validity of service of process upon their…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Mueller v. Seaboard Commercial Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hoffman v. United Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1983
- City of Paterson v. Fargo Realty Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- In Re Benefit of Creditors of Maple Contractors, Inc., Gen. AssignmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Moon Carrier v. RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Cintron v. W & D MACHINERY CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.