Legal Opinion

Cintron v. W & D MACHINERY CO.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 29, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

182 N.J. Super. 126 (1981)

440 A.2d 76

EDWIN CINTRON, PLAINTIFF,

v.

W & D MACHINERY COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION AND WINKLER & DUNNEBIER, A WEST GERMAN CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Hudson County.

Decided October 29, 1981.

Alexander W. Booth, Jr., for plaintiff (Brownstein, Gold & Booth, attorneys).

Robert F. Colquhoun, for defendant W & D Machinery Company, Inc.

Bernard Chazen, for defendant Winkler & Dunnebier.

YOUNG, J.S.C.

Whether or not service of process must be made upon a West German corporation according to the "Convention on the Service Abroad of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Mueller v. Seaboard Commercial Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  4. Hoagland v. SpringerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  5. Certisimo v. Heidelberg CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dewey v. VOLKSWAGEN AGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
  2. Sacotte v. Ideal-Werk Krug & Priester MacHinen-fabrikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Charles Gendler & Co. v. Nippon Electric Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API