Funny Guy, LLC v. Lecego, LLC
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY
This case involves only one underlying dispute: The Funny Guy, LLC contends that it was not paid for work it did for Lecego, LLC. 1 That dispute, however, generated three cascading theories of recovery against Lecego. Funny Guy first claimed that, after the dispute arose, Lecego agreed to pay almost all (about 97%) of the money that it allegedly owed as part of a settlement agreement (the settlement theory). Funny Guy filed suit on that theory and lost because the trial court found that no such settlement ever existed.
After that theory proved unsuccessful,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- MacDougall v. LevickSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v. Allianz Risk Transfer AGCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
- John Bennett v. James GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Lane v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2019
- Robert & Bertha Robinson Family, LLC v. AllenSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.