Legal Opinion
Durand v. Industrial Commission
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided October 19, 2006No. 101109PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitzgerald
Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Freeman and Kilbride concurred in the judgment and opinion.
Justice Garman dissented, with opinion, joined by Justice Karmeier.
Justice Burke took no part in the decision.
OPINION
Deana Durand filed a claim for benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act (see 820 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 2004)) after she developed carpal tunnel syndrome. The Illinois Industrial Commission1 found that Durand’s injury manifested itself more than three years before she filed her claim, and thus her claim was time barred. See 820 ILCS 305/6(d) (West 2004). The trial court confirmed…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Peoria County Belwood Nursing Home v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Benson v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- International Harvester v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Wagner Castings Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Metropolitan Water Reclamation District v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- City of Springfield v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- S&H Floor Covering, Inc. v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Baumgardner v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.