Parks v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtLowe, J.
The evidentiary issue in the case before us exemplifies a tendency of some prosecutors who "overtry” their cases intending, perhaps, to err if at all on the side of prudence. But too much is not always prudent. A careful carpenter, for example, will resist the temptation to add that one last nail which will frequently split the board, weakening, rather than reinforcing, the structure he is trying to build. A careful lawyer also knows when to stop hammering, although the hairline fractures are not always immediately apparent. Unless the same craftsman defends his structure on appeal, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matusky v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Farewell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- People v. RosenthalColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Buzbee v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.