Legal Opinion

Elizondo v. Ramirez

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 17, 2001No. 2 — 00—0698PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Grometer

Plaintiff, Raul G. Elizondo, as special administrator of the estate of Rodolfo Garcia, Jr., appeals the decision of the circuit court of Kane County granting summary judgment in favor of defendants, Rigoberto Ramirez, Mrs. Rigoberto Ramirez (Manuela), and Judith Ramirez. Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in finding defendants owed plaintiffs decedent, Rodolfo Garcia, Jr., no duty of care. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

BACKGROUND

Rigoberto and Manuela Ramirez own a house located in the City of Aurora. At the time of the incident that forms…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Rowe v. State Bank of LombardIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Ziemba v. MierzwaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hills v. Bridgeview Little League Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Charles v. SeigfriedIllinois Supreme Court · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Biscan v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Simmons v. HomatasIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Dargis v. Paradise Park, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. Haupt v. SharkeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Salte v. YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago FoundationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API