Legal Opinion

Marvis v. Marvis

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1925Published

1Opinion of the Court

Lazansky, J.:

Action to annul a marriage on the ground that defendant was at the time of the marriage, and still is, insane.

Article 67 of the Civil Practice Act, entitled “Action to annul a marriage,” makes no provision for an action to be brought by the sane person. There is cogent reason for concluding that actions to annul a marriage are not purely statutory. Section 7 of the Domestic Relations Law (as amd. by Laws of 1924, chap. 165), after naming four conditions under which a marriage may be voidable, provides: “Actions to annul a void or voidable marriage may be brought only as provided…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stokes v. . StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Griffin v. . GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Wightman v. WightmanNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
  4. Walter v. . WalterNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Powell v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API