SUPERVISOR OF ASSESS. OF HARFORD CTY. v. Otremba
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtWeant, J.
Justice Sutherland once said "[t]he legal right of a taxpayer to decrease the amount of what otherwise would be his taxes, or altogether avoid them, by means which the law permits, cannot be doubted.” 1 This case demonstrates one taxpayer’s unsuccessful effort to take advantage of this right and to achieve a reduction in his Harford County real property taxes.
Louis J. Otremba, appellant, was the owner of a single family dwelling at 403 Dunfield Court in Joppatown, Maryland. During the period in question, the property was not occupied by the owner but was inhabited by Mr. Otremba’s daughter…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- National Can Corp. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Pitts v. State Board of Examiners of PsychologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Howell v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rio Algom Corp. v. San Juan CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Schievella v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Rio Algom Corp. v. San Juan CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1984