Legal Opinion

Schievella v. Department of Taxes

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 23, 2000No. 99-385PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs Randall and Susan Schievella appeal from the Washington Superior Court’s order dismissing their complaint under VR.C.E 12(b)(6) for lack of standing. The complaint challenged the constitutionality of the income definition and eligibility requirements of the Homestead Property Tax Income Sensitivity Adjustment, 32 VS.A. § 6061 et seq., as arbitrary and discriminatory. On appeal, plaintiffs argue that they have standing to challenge provisions of the statute and that their complaint states a claim upon which relief can be granted. We affirm.

Plaintiffs filed a complaint in Washington…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sadie Boyd, Madeline Klein & Town of Whitingham v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
  2. Representative Donald Turner, Jr. and Senator Joseph Benning v. Governor Peter ShumlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  3. Sara Vitale v. Bellows Falls Union High SchoolSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
  4. Sandra Baird and Jared CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  5. D.R. Ward Construction Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API