Legal Opinion
State v. Trachtman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 31, 1997No. 1 CA-CR 96-0628PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
Alan Trachtman appeals his convictions for violations of two criminal provisions of the Carefree Town Code relating to zoning. He asserts that the two provisions, one forbidding operating a business enterprise at his residence and the other allowing only those uses which are accessory to residential purposes, are unconstitutionally vague. We affirm both convictions.
FACTS
In May 1994, Trachtman was charged with six counts of criminal conduct relating to the use of his residence. The municipal court dismissed one count prior to trial, directed a verdict for Trachtman…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. AlawyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- State v. SeyrafiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Ottaway v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Government Employees Insurance Company v. NadkarniDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019