Legal Opinion
People v. Mannina
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 22, 2011PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the County Court improperly sentenced him upon his violation of a condition of his probation *1039without ordering an updated presentence report is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gambichler, 25 AD3d 722, 723 [2006]) and, in any event, without merit (see People v Kuey, 83 NY2d 278, 282 [1994]; cf. People v Pons, 134 AD2d 378, 378-379 [1987]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Skelos, J.P, Angiolillo, Belen, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. KueyNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. GambichlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. PonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. McGinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. GledhillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. McGheeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. CaminoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. CaminoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.