People v. Gledhill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the County Court improperly sentenced her without obtaining an updated presentence report is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Mannina, 89 AD3d 1038 [2011]; People v Thompson, 65 AD3d 1390 [2009]; People v Grzywaczewski, 61 AD3d 699, 700 [2009]; People v Ruffino, 52 AD3d 624, 625 [2008]; People v Ramirez, 29 AD3d 1022 [2006]) and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Kuey, 83 NY2d 278, 282-283 [1994]; People v Mannina, 89 AD3d 1038 [2011]; People v Ruff, 50 AD3d 1167, 1168 [2008]).
The resentence imposed was not excessive…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. KueyNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. RuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. GrzywaczewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. McGinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. McGheeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. CaminoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. CaminoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. Houston P. B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.