Roanoke Railroad & Lumber Co v. Privette
Supreme Court of North Carolina
MotioN by defendant to retax tbe costs for printing tbe record.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
Tbis is a motion by tbe defendant, upon notice,' to retas tbe costs against tbe plaintiff for tbe full amount of printing tbe record, upon tbe ground tbat all tbe parts of tbe record printed were necessary, and further, tbat wben tbe statement of tbe case on appeal was settled by tbe trial judge tbe appellee (plaintiff) insisted tbat tbe entire charge of Ms Honor should constitute a part of the record on appeal. The plaintiff has not controverted this statement.
Rule 32 provides: “Judge and counsel should not encumber the 'case on appeal’ with evidence or with matters not pertinent to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilson v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Yow v. Hamilton.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Blackwell Durham Tobacco Co. v. McElweeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Kivett v. . McKeithanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Harris v. Davenport.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Town of Durham v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891