Legal Opinion

State Of Washington, Res. v. Jeffrey S. Sanders, App.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 21, 2013No. 68771-9Published

1Opinion of the Court

Uj'.'h! Or Afri b iA! L uV i.'AOMiN'G ! C' 20I3OCT2! AH 8=26 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 68771-9-1 Respondent, DIVISION ONE JEFFREY SAUNDERS, PUBLISHED OPINION Appellant FILED: October 21.2013 Spearman, A.C.J. — The purpose of the "essential elements" rule in the context of a to-convict instruction is to ensure that the jury is not left guessing at the meaning of an element of the crime and that the State is not relieved of its burden of proving each element of the crime. By contrast, the goal of the "essential elements" rule in the context of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. BergeronWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API