Legal Opinion

Scharrer v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided June 2, 1992No. Civ. N-90-622 (WWE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

EGINTON, District Judge.

FACTS

Defendant, H. Krevit & Co., Inc. [“Krev-it”] moves, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), to dismiss the amended complaint.

Plaintiff, an Ohio resident, alleges that he was injured as a result of a chemical spill that occurred on May 12, 1989. On that date, Scharrer was an employee of the Consolidated Rail Corporation [“ConRail”], working in the Cedar Hill Yard of the railroad.

Scharrer’s original complaint was filed on November 7, 1990, against ConRail. In that complaint, he claimed negligence under the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  4. James Wood, Cross v. Allen Worachek, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  5. Allen Williams B/n/f Louise J. Smyre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Collin v. Securi InternationalDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
  2. Velsini v. CadmusDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1994
  3. Cabrera v. LawlorDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API