Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. . Jonas

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 8, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBbogdeN, J.

If a. notary public owns a life estate in a parcel of land, is he qualified to take the acknowledgment of the grantor and his wife to the execution of a deed of trust upon the remainder in fee?

It has been generally held that if a notary public is a party, trustee, or cestui que trust, in a conveyance of land that he is disqualified to probate the instrument or to take the acknowledgment of its execution. Blanton v. Bostic, 126 N. C., 418, 35 S. E., 1035; Cowan v. Dale, 189 N. C., 684, 128 S. E., 155; Bank v. Tolbert, 192 N. C., 126, 133 S. E., 558; Investment Company v. Woolen, 198 N. C.,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cowan v. DaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. B. Blanton & Co. v. BosticSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Cowan v. . DaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. County Savings Bank of Abbeville v. TolbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Investment Company v. . Wooten Wooten v. . Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Galloway v. CinelloWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API