Cowan v. Dale
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
Tbe chattel mortgage did not create a preference within tbe meaning of C. S., 1611; but tbe plaintiff asserts tbat in effect it was an assignment for tbe benefit of creditors and void because tbe trustees or mortgagees did not file an inventory as required by section 1610. It bas been beld tbat where one who is insolvent makes a mortgage of practically all bis property to secure one or more preexisting debts tbe instrument will be considered an assignment and tbe result will not be changed by tbe omission of a small part of bis property; but to apply tbis doctrine it is necessary to show tbat…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Hauselt v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Todd, Schenck & Co. v. OutlawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- State Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Frank v. MinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- McDowell v. LockhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Snyder v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CogginCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- McClure v. . CrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Whitehurst v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Whitehurst v. . GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.